Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
the research laboratory of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration

Charles Fenimore; John Libert; Stephen Wolf

Abstract: We present results of subjective viewer assessment of video quality of MPEG-2 compressed video containing wide-band Gaussian noise. The video test sequences consisted of seven test clips (both classical and new materials) to which noise with a peak-signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR) of from 28 dB to 47 dB was added. We used software encoding and decoding at five bit-rates ranging from 1.8 Mb/s to 13.9 Mb/s. Our panel of 32 viewers rated the difference between the noisy input and the compression-processed output. For low noise levels, the subjective data suggests that compression at higher bit-rates can actually improve the quality of the output, effectively acting like a low-pass filter. We define an objective and a subjective measure of scene criticality (the difficulty of compressing a clip) and find the two measures correlate for our data. For difficult-to-encode material (high criticality), the data suggest that the effects of compression may be less noticeable at mid-level noise, while for easy-to-encode video (low criticality), the addition of a moderate amount of noise to the input led to lower quality scores. This suggests that either the compression process may have reduced noise impairments or a form of masking may occur in scenes that have high levels of spatial detail.

Keywords: noise; Video; quality; metrics; objective; subjective; correlation; MPEG-2; perception; scene; criticality


To request a reprint of this report, contact:

Lilli Segre, Publications Officer
Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
(303) 497-3572
LSegre@ntia.gov

For technical information concerning this report, contact:

Margaret H. Pinson
Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
(303) 497-3579
mpinson@ntia.doc.gov


Disclaimer: Certain commercial equipment, components, and software may be identified in this report to specify adequately the technical aspects of the reported results. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, nor does it imply that the equipment or software identified is necessarily the best available for the particular application or uses.

Back to Search Results